| To: | "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Domain Key support |
| From: | "John Nietzsche" <john.nietzsche@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:45:08 -0300 |
| Cc: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tiyNGMA4cobA120x2wP7VPhQBdKmySQc6iLDjJFqY19CTCE0e9ayAhuTvZIb2RxBfHdEYMWwpiCT4zczjJOmqfYukSmit/C9q5egir0CR4Znknm6Yr2K3NQvoISXGxIaU96ATaitqtm2Jh/xAl7/cmNHCtqsZmFtAP6nE3dROvQ= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qTLDp7pAS/fbg6D3nU4AuDRAXphEK5JAhIlonvKkLea3MxTjVtyOobVHZhFn1JKzReeBeeaDY/a0zzyScv9RyIMNG4et0qfPudfzkxenEmJHSk9PINsRR/4k3+L+IkxOYqH5xIOlR+JeN4l+euvhqY2OVM0YNg4occSlgPlg9lw= |
| Domainkey-status: | good (test mode) |
| In-reply-to: | <20070322130354.44140.qmail@simone.iecc.com> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <58eb69ab0703220418h72f29478nfc7e18764645aaa@mail.gmail.com> <20070322130354.44140.qmail@simone.iecc.com> |
I am confused! the support is required on the mail server or on the client side? Thanks a lot. On 22 Mar 2007 13:03:54 -0000, John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote: >i am considering adding dns records for domainkeys. I would like to >implement email authentication using djbdns, qmail and the end user >email utilities. I wonder if anyone in this list have done so before? Russ Nelson has written qmail support for DK and, I think, DKIM. >scenario? I mean: will a user receiving/sending email from a >desktop/workstation using Firefox or even native MS mua be able to >encrypt/decrypt messages he sent/receives? DK does signing, not encryption. I don't know of any MUA with DK support but it hardly matters. R's, John |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Domain Key support, Kyle Wheeler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Domain Key support, Khalid Maqsudi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Domain Key support, Russ Nelson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Domain Key support, Khalid Maqsudi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |