| To: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Domain Key support |
| From: | John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> |
| Date: | 22 Mar 2007 17:05:45 -0000 |
| Cc: | kyle-qmail@memoryhole.net |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <20070322141818.GB9211@c-76-18-79-168.hsd1.nm.comcast.net> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| Organization: |
> DKIM is doing to DK what Sender ID did to SPF. Insist that the > IETF standardize on the standard instead of pulling an ISO and > chasing paper standards. That was a while ago. The IETF working group finished, the DKIM standard is done. It's in the queue to be edited into an RFC, but the rules for that say that there's only editorial changes, not technical ones, between now and RFC-hood. If you want to test for interoperability, Google gmail is signing with DKIM now. R's, John |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Domain Key support, Kyle Wheeler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | queued email, Michael Di Martino |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Domain Key support, Kyle Wheeler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Domain Key support, Kyle Wheeler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |