Re: Broken DomainKey Implementation

["Erik A. Espinoza" <erik.espinoza@gmail.com>]

Not sure where to make bug reports which is why I asked here, but
there are a ton of bugs. Here are a few that I can recall off the top
of my head.

1) No reporting at all. Mail gets dropped without notice to the admin
2) Doesn't honor disabling. If you disable it, qmail-dk can still drop mail.
3) Doesn't honor testing flag in DNS
4) Doesn't set "h=" flag which states what is covered by the sig
(causes forwards and backup mx mail to fail)

This is just to start. I am a lead on the QmailToaster project
(http://www.qmailtoaster.com/) and qmail-dk is about to be removed
because it isn't consistent behavior. It is scheduled to be removed
from our distribution.

Erik

On 4/1/07, Charles Cazabon <qmail@discworld.dyndns.org> wrote:
> Erik A. Espinoza <erik.espinoza@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know if the current/broken qmail-dk implementation [...]
>
> Assumes facts not in evidence.  How is it broken?  Do you have a bug report to
> make?
>
> Charles
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Charles Cazabon                               <qmail@discworld.dyndns.org>
> Read http://pyropus.ca/personal/writings/12-steps-to-qmail-list-bliss.html
> My services include qmail consulting.  See http://pyropus.ca/ for details.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------