Qmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: tai64n date format

To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Subject: Re: tai64n date format
From: "Vahid Moghaddasi" <vahid.moghaddasi@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:59:21 -0400
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: gmail-qmail@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: sp.com.list@gmail.com
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=F5KQ2vkUbl96CITxC9uLTz3ZYEzFXMbfqDnGTuWNovREaSPiUKh+GJqjziyB9bZRu9LI9bswp+gkVATS9DXobr9W3MF196qqv4xiZpZTXXP2r7wd9xdgfhoXCvT5oFyojFbLW5RFY0XcEmrQFf2iPU1VCXy+yaMvGHmBb2NHToI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hCFEYyKSWAxXD10C6OlpRoMwlaoBv4HPFmb6/M3vUF/kmv+LXraOsiliJgPuQmjUT4tPvkpioIhESg16UTDg+02OzVSYIdnI7zW6ZDiwHSPbRQKgePto5mpTdyztOrEJDwFzsctbkepbov7VEC0LmVsZkx1yr6T+LAi+K6g41vM=
Domainkey-status: good (test mode)
In-reply-to: <20070402083232.GB27262@c-76-18-79-168.hsd1.nm.comcast.net>
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <a3bd4fe00704011052n1132c340k1320805947292f73@mail.gmail.com> <20070401181250.GA11214@odin.dempsky.org> <a3bd4fe00704011137s6186d8c6v60f5c4d200fb47ad@mail.gmail.com> <20070401185119.gvx5onvbvokzrjsm@m.safari.iki.fi> <a3bd4fe00704011420l1edac314q10c5b1d703713505@mail.gmail.com> <20070401215106.rdrpfzm6abysx4oa@m.safari.iki.fi> <a3bd4fe00704011519h11d58dfcua2fa97a6b7cf2297@mail.gmail.com> <20070401224145.GA6286@discworld.dyndns.org> <a3bd4fe00704011930wd95da39p177e42ca46e15419@mail.gmail.com> <20070402083232.GB27262@c-76-18-79-168.hsd1.nm.comcast.net>
On 4/2/07, Kyle Wheeler <kyle-qmail@memoryhole.net> wrote:

Uh, no offense, but that's the whole point. Without the patch, matchup
cannot read the timestamps, and so IGNORES all time calculations.
Because of that...

Bitter taste of truth...


> Non-patched matchup shows 0.00 for all delay.

....

I'm surprised you didn't think it odd that non-patched qmailanalog
reported that all mail was delivered instantaneously and that your
logs covered 0 days worth of mail.

Well, it did seem very odd but looks much better on the report :)
I am not sure how the report shows over 3 days of delay for 24h log file?
Total ddelay (s): 278639.381440 or ddelay must be the sum of all
delays for mail delivery, am I correct?

~Kyle

Thanks Kyle.


--
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought
which they avoid.
                                -- Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>