| To: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: tai64n date format |
| From: | "Vahid Moghaddasi" <vahid.moghaddasi@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:59:21 -0400 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=F5KQ2vkUbl96CITxC9uLTz3ZYEzFXMbfqDnGTuWNovREaSPiUKh+GJqjziyB9bZRu9LI9bswp+gkVATS9DXobr9W3MF196qqv4xiZpZTXXP2r7wd9xdgfhoXCvT5oFyojFbLW5RFY0XcEmrQFf2iPU1VCXy+yaMvGHmBb2NHToI= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hCFEYyKSWAxXD10C6OlpRoMwlaoBv4HPFmb6/M3vUF/kmv+LXraOsiliJgPuQmjUT4tPvkpioIhESg16UTDg+02OzVSYIdnI7zW6ZDiwHSPbRQKgePto5mpTdyztOrEJDwFzsctbkepbov7VEC0LmVsZkx1yr6T+LAi+K6g41vM= |
| Domainkey-status: | good (test mode) |
| In-reply-to: | <20070402083232.GB27262@c-76-18-79-168.hsd1.nm.comcast.net> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <a3bd4fe00704011052n1132c340k1320805947292f73@mail.gmail.com> <20070401181250.GA11214@odin.dempsky.org> <a3bd4fe00704011137s6186d8c6v60f5c4d200fb47ad@mail.gmail.com> <20070401185119.gvx5onvbvokzrjsm@m.safari.iki.fi> <a3bd4fe00704011420l1edac314q10c5b1d703713505@mail.gmail.com> <20070401215106.rdrpfzm6abysx4oa@m.safari.iki.fi> <a3bd4fe00704011519h11d58dfcua2fa97a6b7cf2297@mail.gmail.com> <20070401224145.GA6286@discworld.dyndns.org> <a3bd4fe00704011930wd95da39p177e42ca46e15419@mail.gmail.com> <20070402083232.GB27262@c-76-18-79-168.hsd1.nm.comcast.net> |
On 4/2/07, Kyle Wheeler <kyle-qmail@memoryhole.net> wrote: Uh, no offense, but that's the whole point. Without the patch, matchup cannot read the timestamps, and so IGNORES all time calculations. Because of that... Bitter taste of truth... > Non-patched matchup shows 0.00 for all delay. .... I'm surprised you didn't think it odd that non-patched qmailanalog reported that all mail was delivered instantaneously and that your logs covered 0 days worth of mail. Well, it did seem very odd but looks much better on the report :) I am not sure how the report shows over 3 days of delay for 24h log file? Total ddelay (s): 278639.381440 or ddelay must be the sum of all delays for mail delivery, am I correct? ~Kyle Thanks Kyle. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Qmail and Bounce Message Spamming, Charles Cazabon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Many domain to one server, Vahid Moghaddasi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: tai64n date format, Kyle Wheeler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: tai64n date format, Kyle Wheeler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |