| To: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: timeoutsmtpd downsides |
| From: | Jeremy Kister <qmail-06@jeremykister.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:10:57 -0400 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <20070404185032.GA22829@c-76-18-79-168.hsd1.nm.comcast.net> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <20070404185032.GA22829@c-76-18-79-168.hsd1.nm.comcast.net> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0b2 (Windows/20070116) |
On 4/4/2007 2:50 PM, Kyle Wheeler wrote: Are there drawbacks to lowering my timeout value that I'm not thinking of? Has anyone done this before and have any reports as to possible side-effects? I was in the same boat. we tried to lower the timeoutsmtpd as an experiment, actually. Since it seemed to work, i never changed it back :) I've been running a bunch of machines handling a lot of mail with a 15 second timeoutsmtpd. It's been over a year, and I haven't received complaints of customers losing mail. -- Jeremy Kister http://jeremy.kister.net./ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Broken DomainKey Implementation, Erik A. Espinoza |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: timeoutsmtpd downsides, Charles Cazabon |
| Previous by Thread: | timeoutsmtpd downsides, Kyle Wheeler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: timeoutsmtpd downsides, Charles Cazabon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |