| To: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: timeoutsmtpd downsides |
| From: | Sami Farin <safari-qmail@safari.iki.fi> |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Apr 2007 00:06:11 +0300 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <20070404203505.GG22829@c-76-18-79-168.hsd1.nm.comcast.net> |
| Mail-followup-to: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <20070404185032.GA22829@c-76-18-79-168.hsd1.nm.comcast.net> <20070404200830.iqla4pperu4iwhf2@m.safari.iki.fi> <20070404203505.GG22829@c-76-18-79-168.hsd1.nm.comcast.net> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) |
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 14:35:05 -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Wednesday, April 4 at 11:08 PM, quoth Sami Farin: > >On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 12:50:32 -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > >>Hello, > >> > >>Because of some recent spammer behavior (looks like > >>reverse-tarpitting), I'm considering reducing my timoutsmtpd value > > > >Are you using bannerdelay feature? > > Yes; but that's not what's keeping connections open. The offending If you hadn't been using it, I would have said that doing so might cut down number of these spambots (without waiting timeoutsmtpd seconds). > connections are averaging around 1200 seconds in length (i.e. the They do not send any commands? > timeoutsmtpd default), which is way longer than my initial delay > (which maxes out at 26 seconds). --
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Broken DomainKey .. or dead project?, Matt Simpson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Broken DomainKey .. or dead project?, Kyle Wheeler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: timeoutsmtpd downsides, Kyle Wheeler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: timeoutsmtpd downsides, Kyle Wheeler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |