Qmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Broken DomainKey .. or dead project?

To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Subject: Re: Broken DomainKey .. or dead project?
From: Kyle Wheeler <kyle-qmail@memoryhole.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 20:57:41 -0600
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: gmail-qmail@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: sp.com.list@gmail.com
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=Im01EdD5HhDGakwLqe47e8+dZdajjPGV10H1T5hee4vgGTDzddB26OTTt2MHf5NEo9Wxhg2jSlk8SvaluwllOFPD+5XFdvJHWUUmNsubEewc1IKvDqRFswPbskPZxpJtzTGJkPX8mhNO/ynqzKFsHW7A89NXptUPLLWG8IVaaqU= ;
Domainkey-status: good
In-reply-to: <20070405001219.GI27526@aleut.local>
Mail-followup-to: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <20070401225748.GA6359@discworld.dyndns.org> <1175514940.31108.92.camel@castor.taos-it.nl> <b86db13f0704041207p6b6c548ai617ff192c7d27414@mail.gmail.com> <p06240603c239aa94b54f@128.163.18.106> <20070404200344.GA20446@discworld.dyndns.org> <20070404202452.GD22829@c-76-18-79-168.hsd1.nm.comcast.net> <82e8e3c60704041449n6b6f10ccw3c82f0f9ebd7dd22@mail.gmail.com> <20070404232219.GF27526@aleut.local> <b86db13f0704041650m67f7ab2er7411a9d9277332f4@mail.gmail.com> <20070405001219.GI27526@aleut.local>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-04-03)
On Wednesday, April  4 at 06:12 PM, quoth Kyle Wheeler:
On Wednesday, April  4 at 04:50 PM, quoth Erik A. Espinoza:
Sounds like its just not worth the trouble. Funny, I was expecting to
get a lot of "works for me" comments, as I had searched high and low
for info on this patch. So far I've only gotten messages on this list
from users who also have qmail-dk issues.

HEH, well, it does "work for me", more or less, it's just that I had to wrestle with it pretty hard to make it function as well (or badly) as it does. :)

Okay, I take that back. I just discovered the damn thing chokes on group subscription messages from Yahoo that contain multiple From headers. I know, that's a violation of the SMTP spec (RFC 2822, section 3.6), but it makes qmail-dk reject messages even when DKVERIFY="". <sigh>

I'm beginning to like this idea of making a wrapper that uses dktest more and more.

~Kyle
--
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.
                                                           -- Gallileo

Attachment: pgpvrhLvviR5Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>