| To: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Problem relaying over qmail server |
| From: | Kyle Wheeler <kyle-qmail@memoryhole.net> |
| Date: | Tue, 8 May 2007 08:19:00 -0600 |
| Comment: | DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/ |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| Dkim-signature: | v=0.5; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=memoryhole.net; h=received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; q=dns/txt; s=default; bh=K3SEHhBqdd+dPCRVgk+eQX2Bz+0=; b=Yk1kO1qGiGbRnd/oyF6oFTpxZj5zJrjNFW1EvPqDxj6ir+5yZxIalLChhvEhzKPy8bJyuG2k4XGsZzy9KBNtFebBOpKLk+qjVB7JQbwxF0C7EWx7qZByPkpUVeF8nk6fr/8vZCnIyYhz2Foi4RKQNjoCRuqYLK22XPAMdYcMCiM= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=QL9n2vnxuMUYY0BuLiF4PPqb+OHYo2rA/1U/IRwUHU7AWtCJ5UIqNBYZ/6Mpe35mE8gds2ITy1PImdU3u1iASVvfwppNYorQRKvTFnAC7z04shOdQSmQ1wnTR/yzHW1i3jnPJ4vMTW/LayUzt+x+QcAhqwoLeoMfxRn1C+YXJcs=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent; |
| Domainkey-status: | good |
| In-reply-to: | <463F7BC7.7080509@iunius.org> |
| Mail-followup-to: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <463B0D7B.5060705@iunius.org> <20070504135039.GC24696@tunican.local> <463B3FE6.7000505@iunius.org> <20070504145005.GF24696@tunican.local> <463C7D92.1020903@iunius.org> <20070505225451.GI24696@tunican.local> <20070506162909.8tn5onvls0g48ko4@webmail.iunius.org> <20070506145544.GP24696@tunican.local> <463F7BC7.7080509@iunius.org> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-29) |
On Monday, May 7 at 09:19 PM, quoth Andreas Krummrich: I build a new qmail with this patch, but without luck. I just increased the logging of my postfix server, for TLS. Perhaps this helps a bit: I think it may, yes: May 7 21:12:01 santa postfix/smtpd[28035]: 41CC2CD57D: client=bart.springfield.home[10.10.42.10], sasl_method=CRAM-MD5, sasl_username=brutus Aha! CRAM-MD5 requires special support on the part of your checkpassword program, and can be hard to get working in some circumstances (because in order to get it working, checkpassword has to have access to a cleartext version of your password, which is not something typically provided by password storage mechanisms (such as PAM)). Recompile qmail and *disable* CRAM-MD5 advertising. According to Bill Shupp's patch, that's a matter of removing the line in qmail-smtpd.c that looks like this:
#define CRAM-MD5
So now... what's the rest of this...?
May 7 21:12:01 santa postfix/smtp[28038]: TLS connection established to rom.iunius.org: TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits) er? Isn't that who we were talking to earlier? May 7 21:12:01 santa postfix/smtp[28038]: 41CC2CD57D: to=<krummrich@msim.de>, relay=rom.iunius.org[81.169.142.6], delay=0, status=bounced (host rom.iunius.org[81.169.142.6] said: 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts; no valid cert for gatewaying (#5.7.1)) So, no information at all about how it tried to authenticate? I'm not understanding the logical flow here. Anyway, try disabling CRAM-MD5 advertising in qmail-smtpd.c, and see where that gets you. ~Kyle --A woman has the last word in any argument. Anything a man says after that is the beginning of a new argument.
-- Unknown
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Problem relaying over qmail server, Andreas Krummrich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: cname deferral on already chris k.davis patched system, Georgi Georgiev |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Problem relaying over qmail server, Andreas Krummrich |
| Next by Thread: | Script to automatically except legitimate SMTP hosts from greylisting, Daniel Albers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |