| To: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: delivering mail to remote mx with multiple ip |
| From: | Sami Farin <safari-qmail@safari.iki.fi> |
| Date: | Fri, 18 May 2007 17:33:09 +0300 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <200705181624.43397.david.ml@euro-web.fr> |
| Mail-followup-to: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <200705181028.45529.david.ml@euro-web.fr> <20070518090006.tcvzdp7vwvunchrg@m.safari.iki.fi> <200705181624.43397.david.ml@euro-web.fr> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) |
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 16:24:43 +0200, David CHANIAL wrote: > Le vendredi 18 mai 2007 11:00, Sami Farin a écrit : > > I guess you have ":smtp.wanadoo.fr" in control/smtproutes. > > it is not the case, why ask you that ? Because if you have :smtp.wanadoo.fr , returned IP addresses for smtp.wanadoo.fr are not randomized in qmail-remote? You said qmail-remote does not randomize the IP address list? > > At least you have smaller chance of hitting their > > resource usage limit, if each system behind > > each IP address has their own limits? > > The problem is that they probably limit the max connection per/ip. That's what I said? --
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: delivering mail to remote mx with multiple ip, David CHANIAL |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Dozens of qmail-smtpd processes eating 100% of CPU, Alex Kirk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: delivering mail to remote mx with multiple ip, David CHANIAL |
| Next by Thread: | Obeying SPF for relaying customers, Oliver Welter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |