| To: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Dozens of qmail-smtpd processes eating 100% of CPU |
| From: | Kyle Wheeler <kyle-qmail@memoryhole.net> |
| Date: | Fri, 18 May 2007 10:40:51 -0600 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <464DC7B8.5000003@sourcefire.com> |
| Mail-followup-to: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <464DBC1B.30204@sourcefire.com> <004201c7995d$fedc30c0$fc949240$@com> <464DC7B8.5000003@sourcefire.com> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Friday, May 18 at 11:35 AM, quoth Alex Kirk: It's ktrace...and the output is extremely bizzare: 26208 qmail-smtpd EMUL "native" 26208 qmail-smtpd CALL gettimeofday(0xcfbe6c08,0) Indeed! Especially since vanilla qmail-smtpd doesn't call gettimeofday() ever. I suspect we're going to need to know *exactly* what patches you're using in order to debug it. ~Kyle --No man should escape our universities without knowing how little he knows.
-- J. Robert Oppenheimer
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Dozens of qmail-smtpd processes eating 100% of CPU, Kyle Wheeler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Dozens of qmail-smtpd processes eating 100% of CPU, Alex Kirk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Dozens of qmail-smtpd processes eating 100% of CPU, Alex Kirk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Dozens of qmail-smtpd processes eating 100% of CPU, Alex Kirk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |