Qmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: qmail-send nearly stops delivery

To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Subject: Re: qmail-send nearly stops delivery
From: Jeremy Kitchen <kitchen@scriptkitchen.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:16:51 -0400
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: gmail-qmail@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: sp.com.list@gmail.com
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <465CE830.4030109@graffiti.net>
Mail-followup-to: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <00c601c79ee5$00c9e800$183c000a@nbjambor> <465BAEC1.7050301@graffiti.net> <006901c7a1dd$3b011700$183c000a@nbjambor> <20070529181813.GA25227@scriptkitchen.com> <465CE830.4030109@graffiti.net>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 10:57:52AM +0800, Feizhou wrote:
> >>I think that the problem ist solved know. But I will try to use the 
> >>ext-todo
> >>patch or big-ext-todo patch.
> 
> big-ext-todo is needed if you have really high inject rates and your 
> filesystem does not like having thousands of files in a directory.

yes, and no.

big-ext-todo is actually a combination of 2 patches.  big-todo and
ext-todo.

big-todo is for filesystems that don't like having lots of files in one
directory.   ext-todo is for high injection rates.

generally people use big-todo if they use ext-todo, although you can use
big-todo without the ext-todo.

In this case, he definitely needs the ext-todo patch.

-Jeremy

-- 
Jeremy Kitchen ++ kitchen@scriptkitchen.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>