On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 11:25:36AM +0800, Feizhou wrote:
> Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> >On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 10:57:52AM +0800, Feizhou wrote:
> >>>>I think that the problem ist solved know. But I will try to use the
> >>>>ext-todo
> >>>>patch or big-ext-todo patch.
> >>big-ext-todo is needed if you have really high inject rates and your
> >>filesystem does not like having thousands of files in a directory.
> >
> >yes, and no.
>
> Please read what I posted again.
done. Sorry.
> >generally people use big-todo if they use ext-todo, although you can use
> >big-todo without the ext-todo.
>
> Have I posted otherwise?
not directly, however...
> >In this case, he definitely needs the ext-todo patch.
>
> Are you trying to pick a fight?
negative.
> How can you say that when we have
> absolutely no information whatsoever on what filesystem he is using?
what does filesystem have to do with ext-todo? ext-todo is for high
injection rates, where qmail-send will spend more time pre-processing
messages than delivering them.
Now, I admit that there is some missing information before we can
properly diagnose silly qmail syndrome... we haven't seen his qmail-send
logs, so we aren't sure if he's maxing out his remote concurrency (if he
is, he's not suffering, if he isn't, he is suffering), but ext-todo
still doesn't have anything to do with filesystem.
Unless, of course, he's using a network filesystem, like nfs, for the
queue.. which itself would be just stupid :)
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy Kitchen ++ kitchen@scriptkitchen.com
|