Re: qmhandle users

[Mike Wright <xktnniuymlla@mailinator.com>]

Giles Turner wrote:
> On 6/2/07, Mike Wright <xktnniuymlla@mailinator.com> wrote:
>
> > Giles Turner wrote:
> > > qmhandle is now being maintained.
> > >
> > > A fix for a bug that leaves a corrupt queue has made to qmhandle 1.2.1
> > > plus a few minor bugfixes.
> > >
> > > A new version is in the works that will properly report what is in the
> > > queue, perform or respond faster and hopefully make it more convenient
> > > for you to manage the queue.
> > >
> > > Currently, response performance in reporting queue contents for a
> > > 10,000 message queue is almost instant instead of waiting for a long
> > > while before you see any output and deleting the whole queue takes 5-6
> > > seconds as opposed to 13 seconds with qmhandle 1.2. I am planning to
> > > add delete all messages from a sender, flag all messages for a remote
> > > destination for earlier retry and a change in queue reporting has been
> > > made where it will report the total messages in the queue and how many
> > > messages have local recipients, remote recipients and bounces.
> > >
> > > If you are a user of qmhandle and want something, please open a
> > > request in the feature request queue.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Hi, Giles,
> >
> > I also noticed that it's a binary only distribution.  Some users may
> > have problems with a package that they can't audit or patch.
> Er...what is binary about a perl script?
Oy! Mea culpa... I've got two eyes and didn't use either one ;D