| To: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: multilog-watch, qmail-remote, and "Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference..." |
| From: | Amitai Schlair <schmonz@schmonz.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:43:22 -0400 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <18020.27946.626028.437343@sws5.ornl.gov> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <18020.27946.626028.437343@sws5.ornl.gov> |
On Jun 4, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Dave Sill wrote: I think I'm losing it... I've been running Russ Allbery's multilog-watch on a couple systems for years, and all of the sudden I'm getting errors when it tries to mail its reports that seem to be due to qmail-remote not thinking the local host is listed in control/locals. Here's a test:$ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-remote sws5.ornl.gov root@sws5.ornl.gov root@sws5.ornl.gov DSorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host, it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. (#5.4.6) When I do the same test, I get the same output. I'm not aware of any operational hiccups on my test system (though I'm not using multilog- watch). It certainly looks curious, but perhaps the problem lies elsewhere? |
| Previous by Date: | Users receiving failure notices for addresses they haven't mailed, Peter Smith |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | concurrencyremote, Ivan Minovela |
| Previous by Thread: | multilog-watch, qmail-remote, and "Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference...", Dave Sill |
| Next by Thread: | Re: multilog-watch, qmail-remote, and "Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference...", Kyle Wheeler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |