Qmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: multilog-watch, qmail-remote, and "Sorry. Although I'm listed as a b

To: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Subject: Re: multilog-watch, qmail-remote, and "Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference..."
From: Jeremy Kitchen <kitchen@scriptkitchen.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:07:00 -0400
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: gmail-qmail@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: sp.com.list@gmail.com
Delivered-to: mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <18020.27946.626028.437343@sws5.ornl.gov>
Mail-followup-to: qmail@list.cr.yp.to
Mailing-list: contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <18020.27946.626028.437343@sws5.ornl.gov>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:51:06PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
> I think I'm losing it... I've been running Russ Allbery's
> multilog-watch on a couple systems for years, and all of the sudden
> I'm getting errors when it tries to mail its reports that seem to be
> due to qmail-remote not thinking the local host is listed in
> control/locals.
> 
> Here's a test:
> 
> $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-remote sws5.ornl.gov root@sws5.ornl.gov 
> root@sws5.ornl.gov
> DSorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host,
> it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. (#5.4.6)
> $

iirc, qmail-remote doesn't actually look at control/locals

I think when it says that, it's because it assumes that if qmail-remote
is handling the message, that means it's not in control/locals

is the multilog-watch script sending messages via qmail-remote directly?
maybe it should use qmail-inject or qmail-queue instead?

-Jeremy

-- 
Jeremy Kitchen ++ kitchen@scriptkitchen.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>