| To: | qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Filtering Mail Already In Queue |
| From: | "Aaron Goldblatt" <qmailconfused@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 12 Aug 2007 03:07:27 -0500 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-qmail@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list qmail@list.cr.yp.to |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oPYKiRrIib6eF1VEDlGE+dgSUZRm1hKmcIZC5pWEZNTumLqmcMZ4M6i0LnrfzqaedhTjIMv5pv0sDLouv+xhUofF5jtSHrfekhGQjGjafvfrOSCs+Sm+N2fi+jEKrSJNs9LHA7LLiAHZobdtLiwAsLV8ef8CjxEi4S78Fl/Smak= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lTwO77UO96kHB+kS9MyAAiaz9T18HUsjINAbxvCqubptC5ad+rWVYIfImHsf1hOZJXfDrXxpeYttESuzj5dNDRDOZII2WnSeTlxD1/KNtl0PTvQhzQoENvRQmlqxBIo5wSC8TFVJ+y1bORqNkmjju/uQ0bAr5GK287rtEPDw/yg= |
| Domainkey-status: | good (test mode) |
| In-reply-to: | <20070812062632.GT851@tunican.local> |
| Mailing-list: | contact qmail-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <95137d3a0708112220g3e11daa2u2f4f5a164270ce50@mail.gmail.com> <20070812062632.GT851@tunican.local> |
> ...curses based? HAH! You're pretty funny. > No, there is nothing so fancy available. Didn't imagine. But always worth asking. And deleting 600k messages in a curses-based interface would royally suck, but it would likely be faster than just waiting for them to process. > However, all is not lost, if you're willing to "stoop" to the level of > a shell script. I'm not super-comfortable with most scripts, but I actually had started to concoct a horrible one using qmHandle. Yours, however, is better. My quick tests using qmHandle indicate that I'm in for a long night of watching this run, am I not? Neither it nor spamassassin are especially speedy, it seems to me, and this is a lackluster machine for this purpose. Thanks. ag |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Filtering Mail Already In Queue, Kyle Wheeler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Filtering Mail Already In Queue, Kyle Wheeler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Filtering Mail Already In Queue, Kyle Wheeler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Filtering Mail Already In Queue, Kyle Wheeler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |