bugtraq
[Top] [All Lists]

The (in)security of Xorg and DRI

To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Subject: The (in)security of Xorg and DRI
From: Darren Reed <avalon@caligula.anu.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:40:59 +1100 (Australia/ACT)
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: bugtraq-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: mailing list bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Delivered-to: moderator for bugtraq@securityfocus.com
List-help: <mailto:bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:bugtraq@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
In recent discussion, the topic of the Xorg server being a huge
security vulnerability because of its DRI model has come up.

The problem being that you have user space code communicating
with chips in the system and being able to control DMA and what
goes which way on the system bus...

Does anyone have or know of any security exploits that take
advantage of this model and use it to bypass other security
enforcing perimeters?  I'm imaging these to be dedicated
programs to run as root, not simple buffer overflows or
anything of that nature.

While this may not be of concern to the average Joe Bloggs at
home with his Linux desktop, if he were to be running a trusted
version of Linux with the same Xorg and DRI opening, the problem
is a tad different.

Cheers,
Darren

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>