bugtraq
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: local Calendar System v1.1 (lcStdLib.inc) Remote File Include

To: Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org>
Subject: Re: local Calendar System v1.1 (lcStdLib.inc) Remote File Include
From: Stefano Zanero <s.zanero@securenetwork.it>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:46:53 +0100
Cc: trzindan@hotmail.fr, bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: bugtraq-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: mailing list bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Delivered-to: moderator for bugtraq@securityfocus.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0701291259320.14925-100000@linuxbox.org>
List-help: <mailto:bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:bugtraq@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
Organization: Secure Network S.r.l.
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0701291259320.14925-100000@linuxbox.org>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061223)
Gadi Evron wrote:
> How can we all automate the testing process for fake vulns in and list
> them as such without overburdening OSVDB, CVE, Milworm and SecuriTeam?

I suggest to ask for a pointer to the single source file where the
vulnerability exists, a pointer to the archive of the correct version of
the application, and a clear description of the vuln, or otherwise
reject the posting altogether.

This would at least add a filter... and make our life easier when
cross-checking.

Stefano

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>