bugtraq
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: stompy the session stomper - tool availability

To: Rogan Dawes <lists@dawes.za.net>
Subject: Re: stompy the session stomper - tool availability
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@dione.ids.pl>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:16:27 +0100 (CET)
Cc: webappsec@securityfocus.com, pentest@securityfocus.com, bugtraq@securityfocus.com, full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: bugtraq-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: mailing list bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Delivered-to: moderator for bugtraq@securityfocus.com
In-reply-to: <45BC4A39.4000905@dawes.za.net>
List-help: <mailto:bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:bugtraq@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0701261830530.30421@dione> <45BC4A39.4000905@dawes.za.net>
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Rogan Dawes wrote:

> Just wanted to point out that Dave has had nothing to do with WebScarab
> (and that I recognise that WebScarab's analysis is pretty trivial).

Geee, sorry, I suck for misspelling your name (but feel retroactively
avenged: this happens to me quite often ;-).

> Would you have any objection to me including/porting Stompy's analysis
> portion into WebScarab, to make it more accessible to folk?

No, why, it'd be in all likelihood helpful to others; the code is LGPLed,
and I can relicense it to you under some other terms if you prefer.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>