| To: | dns@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: SPF [WAS: Best practices for hosting web but NOT email?] |
| From: | Pete Ehlke <lists-djbdns@rfc822.net> |
| Date: | Tue, 7 Nov 2006 17:14:44 -0600 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-djbdns@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list dns@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0611061443110.10006-100000@piper.av8.net> |
| Mail-followup-to: | dns@list.cr.yp.to |
| Mailing-list: | contact dns-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <20061104172655.GE5023@aleut.local> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0611061443110.10006-100000@piper.av8.net> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.7i |
On Mon Nov 06, 2006 at 15:16:42 -0500, Dean Anderson wrote: > >Blocking non-spam email is a violation of federal anti-trust law >(participation in unlawful group boycott) and also state and federal >electronic privacy laws (no authorization to block non-spam email). >Some letters to Verizon may be necessary. > ( Just can't resist tossing a cookie to the troll... ) And your citations in the Federal Reporter for the decisions that support these contentions are exactly what? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: SPF [WAS: Best practices for hosting web but NOT email?], Dean Anderson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: SPF [WAS: Best practices for hosting web but NOT email?], Kyle Wheeler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SPF [WAS: Best practices for hosting web but NOT email?], Dean Anderson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: SPF [WAS: Best practices for hosting web but NOT email?], Dean Anderson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |