djbdns
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fw: slow DNS on x64 system? - More

To: dns@list.cr.yp.to
Subject: Re: Fw: slow DNS on x64 system? - More
From: Henning Brauer <lists-djbdns@bsws.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:20:33 +0100
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: gmail-djbdns@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: sp.com.list@gmail.com
Delivered-to: mailing list dns@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <20061114145321.a65ed59d@ribeye.akwireless.net>
Mail-followup-to: dns@list.cr.yp.to
Mailing-list: contact dns-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <20061114145321.a65ed59d@ribeye.akwireless.net>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14
* W.D.McKinney <dee@akwireless.net> [2006-11-14 16:53]:
> > * W.D.McKinney <dee@akwireless.net> [2006-11-14 07:57]:
> > > I moved back to our x386 server for 209.112.191.7 and it's working fine.
> > So is tinydns dead on x64 based systems ?
> > 
> > it is working as well as on i386 for us on several 64bit platforms, 
> > namely, alpha, sparc64, amd64 (in order of appearance :) ).
> > your problem almost certainly is not due to running on a LP64 platform.
> > 
> > 
> 
> I see you have an agressive spam engine :-)
> [14/Nov/2006 05:46:16][11420] {smtpc} Received greeting: 220 toryn.bsws.de 
> ESMTP spamd IP-based SPAM blocker; Tue Nov 14 15:45:56 2006

it is greylisting you, that's all.

> I didn't know that it was an LP64 problem, thanks. Here is the architecture:

it is certainly not. I am running djbdns on LP64 architectures. it 
doesn't work any better or worse than on regular boring ILP32 archs.

-- 
Henning Brauer, hb@bsws.de, henning@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>