Hi,
Am Dienstag, 12. Dezember 2006 16:27 schrieb Andreas Schulze:
>
> http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/tinydns-data.html says
> "For versions 1.04 and above: tinydns returns addresses (from + or = or @
> or . or & lines) in a random order in the answer section. If there are more
> than 8 records, it returns a random set of 8."
>
> I could only reproduce the randomness for A-Records
> But I _NEED_ it for my MX-Records...
for me, the above reads like it returns *addresses* (i. e. A records)
in a random order, not every record created from + or = or @ or . or & lines.
> # dig @127.0.0.1 test.local MX +short
> gives me always all 10 MX-Servers for the domain in the _SAME_ order as
> specified in data file.
Supposing your goal is to load-balance between MX-servers of
equal priority - why don't you use a single MX name and a large
number of A records for that name?
Bye,
Peter
--
Peter Conrad Tel: +49 6102 / 80 99 072
[ t]ivano Software GmbH Fax: +49 6102 / 80 99 071
Bahnhofstr. 18 http://www.tivano.de/
63263 Neu-Isenburg
Germany
|