| To: | dns@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Minimal DNS answer using Net::DNS |
| From: | James Raftery <james-djbdns@now.ie> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:51:50 +0000 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-djbdns@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list dns@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <26face530612200720p2e024792rfeab70554a7d685c@mail.gmail.com> |
| Mail-followup-to: | dns@list.cr.yp.to |
| Mailing-list: | contact dns-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <26face530612200720p2e024792rfeab70554a7d685c@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 08:20:13AM -0700, Kelly Jones wrote: > ;; HEADER SECTION > ;; id = 26432 The ID needs to match the ID the client sends. > ;; qr = 0 opcode = QUERY aa = 0 tc = 0 rd = 1 QR should be set. > It's ugly and minimal, but is it a valid DNS answer? Does the question > section actually have to contain the question asked or is that > optional? It's supposed to, but I don't know if DiG cares. You might also like to set RA and/or AA. james -- The probable future is that in time, the use of the apostrophe-s will become the default for all occurrences of the letter s at the end of a word. So we are soon likely to assume it's normal to see apostrophe's at the end of word's, even though reader's of mature year's might think it suck's. -- Dave Williams, comp.risks. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Minimal DNS answer using Net::DNS, Kelly Jones |
|---|---|
| Previous by Thread: | Minimal DNS answer using Net::DNS, Kelly Jones |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |