| To: | david@stults.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: dnscache bug, or ... ? |
| From: | Charlie Brady <charlieb-dns@e-smith.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:58:00 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | dns@list.cr.yp.to |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-djbdns@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list dns@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <49198.64.122.164.12.1170186066.squirrel@stults.com> |
| Mailing-list: | contact dns-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 david@stults.com wrote: > See the example below for what I'm referring to. Even if I were to move > the domain integra.net to a new provider, and the root servers were > appropriately updated, I could keep my dnscache returning the wrong > answers indefinitely as long as two conditions are met: > > 1. The old DNS servers respond authoritatively > 2. I query dnscache prior to TTL expiration on the NS records asking for > the domain SOA. Yes, AIUI, this is a bug in the DNS RFCs. Domain redelegation cannot work reliably if the old DNS servers are not decommissioned. The old servers are rarely under the same administrative control as the new servers. -- Charlie |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: dnscache bug, or ... ?, Malte Tancred |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | dnsq and host give inconsistent results for MX query, Matthew R. Dempsky |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: dnscache bug, or ... ?, Malte Tancred |
| Next by Thread: | dnsq and host give inconsistent results for MX query, Matthew R. Dempsky |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |