djbdns
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: djbdns-1.05-epoll + speedup patch

To: djbdns Mailing List <dns@list.cr.yp.to>
Subject: Re: djbdns-1.05-epoll + speedup patch
From: "Matthew R. Dempsky" <mrd@alkemio.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:01:12 -0600
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: gmail-djbdns@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: sp.com.list@gmail.com
Delivered-to: mailing list dns@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <20070305192601.al2friw762f6iksg@m.safari.iki.fi>
Mail-followup-to: djbdns Mailing List <dns@list.cr.yp.to>
Mailing-list: contact dns-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <20070116171333.GA5674@m.safari.iki.fi> <20070222122129.GE3982@m.safari.iki.fi> <20070222162522.GG3982@m.safari.iki.fi> <20070304161657.qrytvzoi37inmj45@m.safari.iki.fi> <20070305142437.GA27256@odin.dempsky.org> <20070305144746.rrksiglhg3ljhvjp@m.safari.iki.fi> <20070305161316.GB27858@odin.dempsky.org> <20070305162742.GA15295@rfc822.net> <20070305164701.GA28354@odin.dempsky.org> <20070305192601.al2friw762f6iksg@m.safari.iki.fi>
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:26:01PM +0200, Sami Farin wrote:
> Why do you think it was unintentional?

Because I see no reason for the change, and thinking the two
algorithms generate equivalent distributions is a common mistake.

> Why do you think distribution of permutations matters in this case?

I never said I did.  I just wanted to make sure you were aware your
patch changes dnscache's behavior.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>