djbdns
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: djbdns-1.05-epoll + speedup patch

To: djbdns Mailing List <dns@list.cr.yp.to>
Subject: Re: djbdns-1.05-epoll + speedup patch
From: Emilio Perea <eperea@walkereng.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:00:10 -0600
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: gmail-djbdns@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: sp.com.list@gmail.com
Delivered-to: mailing list dns@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <20070307153920.e4674dxjvrwf6nm4@m.safari.iki.fi>
Mail-followup-to: djbdns Mailing List <dns@list.cr.yp.to>
Mailing-list: contact dns-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <20070116171333.GA5674@m.safari.iki.fi> <20070222122129.GE3982@m.safari.iki.fi> <20070222162522.GG3982@m.safari.iki.fi> <20070304161657.qrytvzoi37inmj45@m.safari.iki.fi> <20070307143501.GA19509@codeblau.de> <20070307153920.e4674dxjvrwf6nm4@m.safari.iki.fi>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 05:39:20PM +0200, Sami Farin wrote:
> Well BIND seems to do better, according to this.
> http://www.lurhq.com/cachepoisoning.html

It does, but only if you skip the section reading "This is however
offset by the fact that djbdns also generates random numbers for the
source port of each query..."

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>