djbdns
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: djbdns-1.05-epoll + speedup patch

To: djbdns Mailing List <dns@list.cr.yp.to>
Subject: Re: djbdns-1.05-epoll + speedup patch
From: Charles Cazabon <dns@discworld.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:31:00 -0600
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: gmail-djbdns@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: sp.com.list@gmail.com
Delivered-to: mailing list dns@list.cr.yp.to
In-reply-to: <20070307161630.23wtblm65gfezh2r@m.safari.iki.fi>
Mail-followup-to: djbdns Mailing List <dns@list.cr.yp.to>
Mailing-list: contact dns-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <20070116171333.GA5674@m.safari.iki.fi> <20070222122129.GE3982@m.safari.iki.fi> <20070222162522.GG3982@m.safari.iki.fi> <20070304161657.qrytvzoi37inmj45@m.safari.iki.fi> <20070307143501.GA19509@codeblau.de> <20070307153920.e4674dxjvrwf6nm4@m.safari.iki.fi> <20070307155755.GA28654@discworld.dyndns.org> <20070307161630.23wtblm65gfezh2r@m.safari.iki.fi>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sami Farin <safari-dns@safari.iki.fi> wrote:
> > 
> > Eh?  Are you referring to that analysis of the PRNG in dnscache?
> 
> I only meant 20% vs 30% probability difference in the PRNG,
> excluding random port selection done by djbdns.

You claimed BIND9 was superior to dnscache, and pointed to an article that
explicitly says the opposite:

   I will show later in this article that djbdns offers much greater
   protection against such attacks when deployed properly.
   
I suggest you remove your head from your ass before posting again.

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                              <dns@discworld.dyndns.org>
GPL'ed software available at:               http://pyropus.ca/software/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>