On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:31:00 -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Sami Farin <safari-dns@safari.iki.fi> wrote:
> > >
> > > Eh? Are you referring to that analysis of the PRNG in dnscache?
> >
> > I only meant 20% vs 30% probability difference in the PRNG,
> > excluding random port selection done by djbdns.
>
> You claimed BIND9 was superior to dnscache,
No I didn't. Learn to read.
Here it is again.
"I only meant 20% vs 30% probability difference in the PRNG,
excluding random port selection done by djbdns."
--
pgpaLXciOJOI6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|