| To: | dns@list.cr.yp.to |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: blocking IP ranges from querying tinydns |
| From: | Mike Jackson <mj@sci.fi> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 May 2007 01:12:53 +0300 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | gmail-djbdns@securepoint.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp.com.list@gmail.com |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list dns@list.cr.yp.to |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0705141412050.13350-100000@citation2.av8.net> |
| Mailing-list: | contact dns-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0705141412050.13350-100000@citation2.av8.net> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061025) |
Dean Anderson wrote: > It was decided a long time ago that DNS data is public knowledge. > Cyveillance is doing nothing wrong by monitoring the public web pages > and this obviously means querying the DNS servers for those web sites. > Other search engines do the same. The question was purely technical, not philosophical. I don't want these people monitoring my networks and I am out to stop them in the most fundamental of ways. End of discussion. Anyhow, I thank John for his answer. Yes, it seems the router or firewall is the best place to lock out Cyveillance, and locked out they shall be. -- mike |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: blocking IP ranges from querying tinydns, Miller, Raul D |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: blocking IP ranges from querying tinydns, Dean Anderson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: blocking IP ranges from querying tinydns, Dean Anderson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: blocking IP ranges from querying tinydns, Dean Anderson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |