pen-test
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Trend Micro's Vista "0day exploit auction" claim

To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: Trend Micro's Vista "0day exploit auction" claim
From: "Sels, Roger" <roger.sels@gov-fbi.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 13:11:29 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: pentest-list2@consult.net
Delivered-to: mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <4D82EB5486E2904A912F7A3A2089B5480187F282@sydexch.sydney.uw.local>
List-help: <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
References: <002501c7239f$c8603930$3201a8c0@desktop> <458870C1.4010307@securesystems.ro> <4588786C.4090300@wispdirect.com> <4D82EB5486E2904A912F7A3A2089B5480187F282@sydexch.sydney.uw.local>
Resent-date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:04:53 -0700 (MST)
Resent-from: pen-test-return-1078483261@securityfocus.com
Resent-message-id: <20061219230453.E3DBF238830@outgoing3.securityfocus.com>
Resent-sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
Sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6
Chris,

Good points.
However how did you come to the ascertion that everyone is expecting lots
of exploits ? I for one didn't express this opinion.

Keeping Windows 2003 in mind (and how widely it's deployed, admittedly) we
could be in for a surprise with Vista. Maybe that's too optimistic ; only
time will tell.

Kr

Roger

On Wed, December 20, 2006 12:54 am, Chris Poulter wrote:
> 50k per vulnerability opposed to hundreds (unlikely) 60-100k/year
> (unlikely) - the Q/A's might only get 40-50k/year, a security
> vulnerability technician would be the one getting paid the big bucks,
> but there wouldn't be "hundreds" of them? - how do you work that one out
> to be more feasible?
>
> Considering everyone is presuming there will be lots of exploits,
> 50k/exploit will equate to a much larger payout....
>
> And exploit the exploiters? - how do you figure this one as well?
> Someone getting paid 50k/exploit is far more beneficial to the
> "exploiter" than getting nothing and just sharing the love....where MS
> would lose out more if this happened and leave them more exposed...
>
> I'm not arguing for either side of the case as I haven't looked into it
> enough to make my own judgment, but I don't think your assessment is
> accurate...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com]
> On Behalf Of Cody Tubbs
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 10:40 AM
> To: Radu Oprisan
> Cc: pen-test@securityfocus.com
> Subject: Re: Trend Micro's Vista "0day exploit auction" claim
>
> It's cheaper to pay kids 50k for actually finding flaws, rather than
> paying hundreds of QA engineers 60-100k a pop to spend months finding
> nothing.  Another reason M$ sucks, exploit the exploiters.
>
> -Cody Tubbs
>
> Radu Oprisan wrote:
>> Ryan Meyer wrote:
>>
>>> A number of popular tech news sources are reporting Trend Micro's
> CTO,
>>> Raimund Genes, publicly claiming that there are "auctions" for
> zero-day
>>> Windows Vista exploits. Further, he claims these auctions are
> fetching
>>> approx $50,000.
>>>
>>> Could anyone verify Trend Micro's claim?
>>>
>>
>>
>>> It seems dubious, at best, to me and possibly nothing more than pure
> FUD.
>>>
>>> Sorry to get off topic.
>>>
>>> Ryan Meyer
>>>
>>
>> This could also be some covert way for microsoft to find their own
>> vulnerabilities. That has happened before.
>>
>>
>
>
>


-- 
Life is 10 percent what you make it and 90 percent how you take it. -
Irving Berlin


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>