pen-test
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: pent-test a container file

To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: pent-test a container file
From: "Jamie Riden" <jamesr@europe.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 08:58:18 +1300
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: pentest-list2@consult.net
Delivered-to: mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com
Delivered-to: moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=KhQ4Bbt75vGiTZMVbMCDuHhvOfw9SWRGZ0RYSh3dafNbLspqkEJeMJ5KTnwAeLfOc1ZTJm8HWRuERM6itN7B1hPz/w9WdEIThwa5FD/R8MUFNFNouPR0CjsdgM7FgS7hs/zAhcJNvKe7UrSGbMoSmescvFl/fwluFbQGr1vr23w=
In-reply-to: <f04913100701190228s7f309869v8f9f644bd58d2eb0@mail.gmail.com>
List-help: <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
References: <45AFE40A.7070605@web.de> <f04913100701190228s7f309869v8f9f644bd58d2eb0@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:34:38 -0700 (MST)
Resent-from: pen-test-return-1078483441@securityfocus.com
Resent-message-id: <20070120023438.C37411626F6@outgoing2.securityfocus.com>
Resent-sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
Sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
Sender: jamie.riden@gmail.com
On 19/01/07, Julien <prospi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

So for you, the only possible attack is to "brute force" the password
interface ?
I actually know that the used algo is AES... no more.
The minimum password length to use is 6 characters (including numbers
and special characters..)

If there were any easy attacks against AES, it wouldn't be AES, it
would only be Rijndael :)

Try picking a copy of Practical Cryptography (Schneier), but unless
they've done anything dumb - like having insufficiently random
initialisation vectors, or using ECB mode instead of CBC to encrypt -
it's probably not going to get you very far.  (Hopefully they have
used a decent crypto library like Botan or Peter Gutmann's one, and
haven't rolled their own.)

Cheers,
Jamie
--
Jamie Riden, CISSP / jamesr@europe.com / jamie.riden@gmail.com
NZ Honeynet project - http://www.nz-honeynet.org/

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Need to secure your web apps?
Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast.
Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE.

http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW
------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>