| To: | "'3 shool'" <3shool@gmail.com>, <pen-test@securityfocus.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Website detection |
| From: | "Paul Melson" <pmelson@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:38:20 -0500 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | pentest-list2@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com |
| Delivered-to: | moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:references:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:x-mimeole:in-reply-to:thread-index; b=NavR924LsBn5hpJ6HIzedw43qaB7qdJ6+Eq9YQA4bl5pu4wveoDJ+lUNEji/ShC1YNHxP3A4TGYppn4/9sohpPNm4DF1YxKCan5f0pg+na5mkEu88YNO2DZNQv1nZj6E+o0LFw19EvU+a+YrRyhhw8AtXAEU7VibnNCuF7Ufze4= |
| In-reply-to: | <5a4274b50702190208l76d97209wec4b527a9730ad8a@mail.gmail.com> |
| List-help: | <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com> |
| List-id: | <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com> |
| Mailing-list: | contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <5a4274b50702190208l76d97209wec4b527a9730ad8a@mail.gmail.com> |
| Resent-date: | Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:20:09 -0700 (MST) |
| Resent-from: | pen-test-return-1078483597@securityfocus.com |
| Resent-message-id: | <20070222042009.3D6CB144D40@outgoing2.securityfocus.com> |
| Resent-sender: | listbounce@securityfocus.com |
| Sender: | listbounce@securityfocus.com |
| Thread-index: | AcdVQnCtnOnzo5mnQ1K+dZZ9n5yy1wArOQlg |
> We are doing a PT for one of our customers with 5 webservers. None of these webservers have the website > on the main url like http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx but they have confirmed that they have critical applications > running on all the 5 web servers and for security purposes they have moved the websites to something > like http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/yyy. That's a finding in and of itself. Security through obscurity might keep automated scanners at bay, but it's akin to having an anonymous ftp server running on port 24. It's still potentially vulnerable even though you have to jump through extra hoops to find it. > Now manually I guess it will take years to identify the correct URL having the critical website by using > guessing techniques. I was wondering if there is a tool that could try various popular and brute force > combinations to automatically guess the possible URLs. Have you tried Google searches using 'site:client.dom' to see if possibly these URLs are already floating around out there somewhere? PaulM ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Websites Finding, Hacker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Websites Finding, Chris Hajer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Website detection, pand0ra |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Website detection, Tim |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |