| To: | "jezzzz ." <jezonthenet@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? |
| From: | "Kurt Buff" <kurt.buff@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:56:19 -0800 |
| Cc: | pen-test@securityfocus.com |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | pentest-list2@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com |
| Delivered-to: | moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=V+PG16mFm9AplXKuZIu5NJ1qiQbPBn8gcankEHkmDFdN08+7P0odDVm0M2HtU+gwdHaPLwTKUQEb85asZ/THcfe+RuFuFSWT7AhPFUKndaGygqDeqvElmU8ep+C7jJHeDewen6GxRi2ndgeQEpqJkNYNYXEAOkmUbzmmlvtoDg0= |
| In-reply-to: | <81449.38836.qm@web58106.mail.re3.yahoo.com> |
| List-help: | <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com> |
| List-id: | <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com> |
| Mailing-list: | contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <81449.38836.qm@web58106.mail.re3.yahoo.com> |
| Resent-date: | Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:16:55 -0700 (MST) |
| Resent-from: | pen-test-return-1078483580@securityfocus.com |
| Resent-message-id: | <20070222041655.3F9A5143F6D@outgoing2.securityfocus.com> |
| Resent-sender: | listbounce@securityfocus.com |
| Sender: | listbounce@securityfocus.com |
MAPI? On 2/20/07, jezzzz . <jezonthenet@yahoo.com> wrote: I have some time on my hands (about two months) to work on a new network protocol fuzzer which I intend to write in Python. I don't have much experience in Python but my intention is to learn it by writing the fuzzer. I am looking for a protocol which is interesting and does not yet have a fuzzer for it. IMAP and RIP for instance already seem to have fuzzers. Anyone any ideas for other protocols? Thanks ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Any suggests about a possible LRE (local root escalation), Andrew |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Website detection, Tim |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer?, alan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer?, lobo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |