pen-test
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer?

To: "jezzzz ." <jezonthenet@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer?
From: "Chris Byrd" <cbyrd01@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:57:33 -0600
Cc: pen-test@securityfocus.com
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: pentest-list2@consult.net
Delivered-to: mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com
Delivered-to: moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=efdhW4M4wV6ajpsf6MBMMgrrE2yxrNOjZ5nLzVAyWll+ef6NYJt4ZOhoYLikZeZj6dSAv/TgpxahQBtaMrhG36ULl7fNctC5vrTMswbzHxJL9FKMB9GzdZFF9do3T9rwom3TkRo+FupsxbEYiuLTsPTo3yUGMZT1ym7+WcMJlCs=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rmpaFxkg+3m+SYqUl2qmX3+j52dLM28s3kbaWO3hImVs6r0ny1gQxu1833f3v6vO37y07p79RIgfht8TMYp+SayIl4N6JT77Y9IwU3RyGPcGtJc/gGAGT3m7f2i0CmtvqTY7DjXmojx4m+r+FC2SFUWJDIz7EYHkUjw5ardM4mw=
In-reply-to: <81449.38836.qm@web58106.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
List-help: <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
References: <81449.38836.qm@web58106.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
Resent-date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:19:25 -0700 (MST)
Resent-from: pen-test-return-1078483594@securityfocus.com
Resent-message-id: <20070222041925.B2604144C8D@outgoing2.securityfocus.com>
Resent-sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
Sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
How about an IPv6 stack fuzzer?  Most IPv6 implementations are pretty
new, and there's lots of potential for problems.   Its also on by
default in new OSes.  Anyone on list know of any IPv6 fuzzers out
there?

- Chris

On 2/20/07, jezzzz . <jezonthenet@yahoo.com> wrote:
I have some time on my hands (about two months) to
work on a new network protocol fuzzer which I intend
to write in Python. I don't have much experience in
Python but my intention is to learn it by writing the
fuzzer. I am looking for a protocol which is
interesting and does not yet have a fuzzer for it.
IMAP and RIP for instance already seem to have
fuzzers. Anyone any ideas for other protocols?

Thanks



____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Need to secure your web apps?
Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast.
Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE.

http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW
------------------------------------------------------------------------



------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Need to secure your web apps?
Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast.
Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE.

http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW
------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>