| To: | pen-test@securityfocus.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer? |
| From: | Nicolas RUFF <nicolas.ruff@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 11 Mar 2007 10:15:09 +0100 |
| Cc: | Chris Byrd <cbyrd01@gmail.com>, "jezzzz ." <jezonthenet@yahoo.com> |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | pentest-list2@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com |
| Delivered-to: | moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IKvOiRLGV4C7VL2H7b4RhAaEYf1hPP9pv1jKWyam8bNH9Acb1THvXhP+mR2bJ45JZp5KuvrhHdGgWiD1FmUdM/fyAM0Qfm1kxWVlPlUL73/Ii5RUD9KhkqW2sFkRHkMCX+MiVrd0p3y5xhyLuKaWDKSg/dBSxboEHnQ0MXaaJyw= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uUwq9Ix9e9r/Zk3A1YRf22eWlBB6/LLnRHK6QguS4WyI72KIIe+6k5YfeXyBsviVoCabcNmLuqyutFZVhPFK2ZXu0vRb84WVsyXWqbyOm/Opyym3kOepG49i41gvWekzx6CPNI7Bm5H0M1zwvBGWp5Z9UmBZDWGK3B45OYMRb0o= |
| In-reply-to: | <6e7b3c5e0702210757p1e414fc4l104bf0a45158623a@mail.gmail.com> |
| List-help: | <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com> |
| List-id: | <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com> |
| Mailing-list: | contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <81449.38836.qm@web58106.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <6e7b3c5e0702210757p1e414fc4l104bf0a45158623a@mail.gmail.com> |
| Resent-date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:27:50 -0700 (MST) |
| Resent-from: | pen-test-return-1078483750@securityfocus.com |
| Resent-message-id: | <20070314002750.03BF923A0B0@outgoing3.securityfocus.com> |
| Resent-sender: | listbounce@securityfocus.com |
| Sender: | listbounce@securityfocus.com |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) |
> How about an IPv6 stack fuzzer? Most IPv6 implementations are pretty > new, and there's lots of potential for problems. Its also on by > default in new OSes. Anyone on list know of any IPv6 fuzzers out > there? FYI, there is an IPv6-compliant port of Scapy : http://namabiiru.hongo.wide.ad.jp/scapy6/ At the end, it gives : http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20070124-IOS-IPv6.shtml BTW, learning Python by writing a RDP/ICA fuzzer seems ... challenging, to say the least ! Fuzzing LLDP sounds a good idea. Don't forget PNRP, PNM, LLTD, SMBv2 and other Vista protocols ... And don't worry, we are working on them :) Regards, - Nicolas RUFF Security Researcher @ EADS-IW ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Winzip and Due Diligence, Password Crackers, Inc. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: windows 2003 server, Nicolas RUFF |
| Previous by Thread: | FAX virus, Alcides |
| Next by Thread: | Re: windows 2003 server, Nicolas RUFF |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |