pen-test
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: publications concerning port forwarding

To: "Jason L. Ellison" <infotek@datasync.com>
Subject: Re: publications concerning port forwarding
From: "Jamie Riden" <jamie.riden@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:01:25 +0100
Cc: pen-test <pen-test@securityfocus.com>
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: pentest-list2@consult.net
Delivered-to: mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com
Delivered-to: moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nzAEoPTfifYJYPDJuJRznP+X4/P8jtUrlpGxX4jnt//ct0axRr+vPUHXAz8rg92yVE7CB2mr/drg4E9fyXRYuNAFDTy0Hl5SoLQjy4mag+qf4wZi3PNw3ycFawb7Mk1tKNERspjJ/2p7O8WgdTC4vHK2O0zinaA+3dYVxEbiYxw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aY+QVUDcw7Z3HQZVJOHNw/e4g8Ju1EGFZkz2Y1LujLK6zgDua99zEzoVLAEXv946vsu3Wa3yJJhby6Vq1mZVNVRINIXT7QBoSTjrxmf7KmWLRhCAP9nijn/XyF/jZp8AERbXOdKsW/Ox/niCrfOa7W2XdeVw4ibsHBeJ3inEJ1I=
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0704101707530.6970@shell.datasync.com>
List-help: <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0704101707530.6970@shell.datasync.com>
Resent-date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:31:06 -0600 (MDT)
Resent-from: pen-test-return-1078483911@securityfocus.com
Resent-message-id: <20070411173106.9BC951C2B56@outgoing2.securityfocus.com>
Resent-sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
Sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
On 10/04/07, Jason L. Ellison <infotek@datasync.com> wrote:
List,

  I'm currently doing work for a large company as a consultant.  Another
consultant is installing a MS Exchange server and is now requesting for me
to forward ports on the PIX from the Internet to internal servers.

If they mean a couple of ports like IMAP and POP, then it's not great,
but not such a security risk. If I remember Exchange though, it wants
a huge swathe of ports opened up for goodness knows what. At a
previous workplace, we used to allow 'native' access to Exchange, but
only via our VPN server, not direct to the internet.

Couldn't you suggest using Outlook Web Access, or whatever it's
called? i.e. just open HTTPS through to the internal network. Not
wonderful, but probably better. I assume that's what OWA is intended
for, and it seems to be normal practice.

cheers,
Jamie
--
Jamie Riden, CISSP / jamesr@europe.com / jamie@honeynet.org.uk
UK Honeynet Project: http://www.ukhoneynet.org/

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Need to secure your web apps?
Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast.
Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE.

http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW
------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>