pen-test
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Can we say Back|Track best CD for a Penetration Test

To: "Eagle Fire" <tlecuauhtli@googlemail.com>, listbounce@securityfocus.com, pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Can we say Back|Track best CD for a Penetration Test
From: s-williams@nyc.rr.com
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:13:19 +0000
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: pentest-list2@consult.net
Delivered-to: mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com
Delivered-to: moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <8fbe4a270704240546v69895584la40a0f3487a2e4d6@mail.gmail.com>
List-help: <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
References: <9963932.post@talk.nabble.com><944406050704152042r4b5599f1i753d97cf73a6489b@mail.gmail.com> <8fbe4a270704240546v69895584la40a0f3487a2e4d6@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: s-williams@nyc.rr.com
Resent-date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 15:38:09 -0600 (MDT)
Resent-from: pen-test-return-1078484011@securityfocus.com
Resent-message-id: <20070429213809.073F31451C8@outgoing2.securityfocus.com>
Resent-sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
Sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
Sensitivity: Normal
 I have used both before and found them to be good. I had an old Orinoco Gold 
classic card 802.11. b that I usedto test with.  I amd looking for a few more 
cards that has good support for most pentesting wifi tools, can someone sugest 
a few that the use.
"A wise man ask questions, a fool is afraid of knowledge"  

-----Original Message-----
From: Eagle Fire <tlecuauhtli@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:46:29 
To:pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Can we say Back|Track best CD for a Penetration Test

    For Wireless stuff Backtrack is quite well. I also used Knoppix
S-T-D, it was good but the it had very little support to wireless
card, it was also based on kernel 2.4. I do not really know if there
is a newer version, but it was good if you did not require wireless.

   I agree that this distros are like a box of tools. You can have
many of them and use them as you need.

-tlec

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!

http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>