pen-test
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Format String Vulnerabilities

To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Format String Vulnerabilities
From: andy.x.johnson@cummins.com
Date: 18 May 2007 19:03:59 -0000
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: pentest-list2@consult.net
Delivered-to: mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com
Delivered-to: moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com
List-help: <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
Resent-date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:18:05 -0600 (MDT)
Resent-from: pen-test-return-1078484174@securityfocus.com
Resent-message-id: <20070518191805.64503237852@outgoing3.securityfocus.com>
Resent-sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
Sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
I can assume the string format function is using 'strcpy' to copy the format 
into a pointer.  The easiest solution is to rewrite the code to use the bounds 
checking version 'strncpy'.  This will keep the overflow from happening no 
matter where the pointer address is referenced on the stack.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!

http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>