| To: | "Morning Wood" <se_cur_ity@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Legality of WEP Cracking |
| From: | DaKahuna <da.kahuna@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 19 May 2007 15:39:43 -0400 |
| Cc: | <pen-test@securityfocus.com> |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | pentest-list2@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com |
| Delivered-to: | moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-priority:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=NVsiuvauQH2vaDjnjXEgzFqJATi2f9/3dKuDTEB7gDl5C35p4QrX0ynXd5R6CF61UF1HfNFwMbZtErVqdVMSshjCKy6RyAOIWZBNNeARyiNNxUDcLQQqR+dujCCDAYhiQfuXriCrOR9Y2fCy9xQ8bY+E1kISiEkLfG90LhUB5UM= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-priority:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=PPe3BvA9u+TApBUroGqunrDpakhltyoWHqT55I0Sbvh8w9HE0hFeuf28TEbT4VY8o7Y1P5HbHJy89jz5hzH0imlNdMcI+hCYql29MAobPyum5BmsFkgPbpvdhQUTmsLYApvDPkF4hulQc59kS4lSTsOeh9thfL5Kdq7WZapF5RM= |
| In-reply-to: | <BAY124-DAV125844CF6E6E14E6011176D9320@phx.gbl> |
| List-help: | <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com> |
| List-id: | <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com> |
| Mailing-list: | contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA+QrJM2ZtvkGw8Q52cxvSusKAAAAQAAAAsHC7awQCw0eNjHkJX0gt7QEAAAAA@kanoo-uk.com> <464E3004.9040204@yahoo.com> <BAY124-DAV125844CF6E6E14E6011176D9320@phx.gbl> |
| Resent-date: | Sat, 19 May 2007 13:35:01 -0600 (MDT) |
| Resent-from: | pen-test-return-1078484205@securityfocus.com |
| Resent-message-id: | <20070519193501.D6C2C2379FD@outgoing3.securityfocus.com> |
| Resent-sender: | listbounce@securityfocus.com |
| Sender: | listbounce@securityfocus.com |
On May 18, 2007, at 7:47 PM, Morning Wood wrote: The UK law is clear, I quote from the UK Computer Misuse Act 1990 (http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts1990/Ukpga_19900018_en_2.htm):from what I understand here in the US... "sniffing the air" is legal"connecting to an AP you do not have explicit permission" is illegal"possession of an access restriction device" eg: WEP keythat you are not explicitly allowed permission is illegalcapturing airborne packets "may" be legal, but the moment you begin to"try" to "crack" a WEP key, you would be entering access restriction device realm instantly. ( do not pass GO! ) , as well, simply connecting to yourtarget AP is illegal from the get-go ( gimme your dice! )but my understanding is only a perspective, which may or not be completelyaskew... How about this scenario.I am sitting in a Starbuck$ and am connected to the T-Mobile Wireless service. I start Wireshark and capture all the packets I am seeing from the WAP. Is this legal or illegal? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat? Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic See HOW Now with our 20/20 program! http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: Re: Legality of WEP Cracking, ebk_lists |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Legality of WEP Cracking, Carl Livitt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Legality of WEP Cracking, Morning Wood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Legality of WEP Cracking, Carl Livitt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |