pen-test
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Pentesting Old unsupported Firewall Appliances

To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Pentesting Old unsupported Firewall Appliances
From: Tiago Batista <tiagosbatista@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:43:27 +0100
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: pentest-list2@consult.net
Delivered-to: mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com
Delivered-to: moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pOiEh0CvXSrzv38AHrzuh04FQrtRMT/nbQYzi89SEsT8jBawaSpksIBzqLj3s689CUDQjTdvRKzpmvEriAHVX2sljIpIJnns7iZxeXHOOOqQfzwfhnqcBicMFX/Q2HHe8B7Q1l5gEkSyGSklcwZSXv9uMfyR+8wFKyvEt54nFG8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ejU+PLuvoGbGuPsrvd784Wal5Bfyjl/9rQp3tKLoimyQMsAP5TvwIHuhUjRGSFqfpPkoNnElYNFzDJQR4T+Wy0Vp2PLvg6DYimuB9764xYGVSurpHcR7DOUmxnSekakrDPIn3+xYYqzyVpLJN4GYu4LHMdBu7z8cESwnm1PPOK4=
In-reply-to: <27589.67646.qm@web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
List-help: <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
References: <27589.67646.qm@web38403.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Resent-date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:44:12 -0600 (MDT)
Resent-from: pen-test-return-1078484369@securityfocus.com
Resent-message-id: <20070615164412.96AE11450FC@outgoing2.securityfocus.com>
Resent-sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
Sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 01:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
Harold Castro <b0ydaem0n@yahoo.com> wrote:


> 
> If all else fails, do you tell the customer that it is
> safe to ignore those warnings and vulnerabilities
> because you, on a hacker's perspective, was not able
> to penetrate the network by making use of those
> vulnerabilities found, that the hacker might have a
> hard time as well and eventually opt for another
> target?

I am no security expert, but security by obscurity does not seem the way to go! 
The fact that you did not find any good documentation does not imply that some 
old hacker with a grudge against your client does not have the full docs in his 
basement!


Tiago

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!

http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>