pen-test
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Strange ports

To: Pen-Tests <pen-test@securityfocus.com>
Subject: Re: Strange ports
From: killy <killfactory@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 22:49:16 -0400
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: pentest-list2@consult.net
Delivered-to: mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com
Delivered-to: moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VfPulhYSpxE4Ii3B62bV2eGZNIGqvUwu4y5QAATvxUKDpj8g2U1fBKeJ4weOHUNctMjk1/BSHJ3SnihqE5yBNixFUCgs3k0wL/2KeUiJIODCggu3cPgcySgxkwWmBcN/UuUOoFFNMAAJ6v6fBLUrR7ZXbz6nlfDFhtroFbB8dfM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iXAv0eAvLL5aAug9McoXzBCLQ4X8+wFg5o971NkVbDoVdEiIHNgjwL0NVu2u94EaBebNw2kWqFRosGFHEuFCKh2BCe/NVFibKJFjXTcImGPkQCdd5TGXgTijYowuGcs0YYOAxnuDJ77aJ9j2oVylbBmFDkkcFODrouxUuzuTRqg=
In-reply-to: <9c43c6dd0706181159g412a60bekeaabcae80143172a@mail.gmail.com>
List-help: <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
References: <9c43c6dd0706181159g412a60bekeaabcae80143172a@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 00:41:20 -0600 (MDT)
Resent-from: pen-test-return-1078484454@securityfocus.com
Resent-message-id: <20070624064120.23331143ABB@outgoing2.securityfocus.com>
Resent-sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
Sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
Thanks for all of the great responses.

I guess it may help to clear up a few things.

53 is valid and documented.
3389 is not documented, but I already know the answer before I ask why
they did this ;-)

But 1029 and 1032, were the interesting ones ot me.

Not documented or common to myself.









On 6/18/07, killy <killfactory@gmail.com> wrote:
Scanning my external firewall(at work), I (yes, it is my job to) find this:


PORT     STATE    SERVICE
53/tcp   open     domain

1029/tcp open     ms-lsa
1032/tcp open     iad3

3389/tcp open     ms-term-serv


Why would 1029 and 1032 need to be open from the outside?

-Kill


--
If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked.
What's more, you deserve to be hacked.
-- former White House cybersecurity czar Richard Clarke



--
If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked.
What's more, you deserve to be hacked.
-- former White House cybersecurity czar Richard Clarke

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!

http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>