| To: | Pen-Tests <pen-test@securityfocus.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Strange ports |
| From: | killy <killfactory@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 23 Jun 2007 22:49:16 -0400 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | pentest-list2@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com |
| Delivered-to: | moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VfPulhYSpxE4Ii3B62bV2eGZNIGqvUwu4y5QAATvxUKDpj8g2U1fBKeJ4weOHUNctMjk1/BSHJ3SnihqE5yBNixFUCgs3k0wL/2KeUiJIODCggu3cPgcySgxkwWmBcN/UuUOoFFNMAAJ6v6fBLUrR7ZXbz6nlfDFhtroFbB8dfM= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iXAv0eAvLL5aAug9McoXzBCLQ4X8+wFg5o971NkVbDoVdEiIHNgjwL0NVu2u94EaBebNw2kWqFRosGFHEuFCKh2BCe/NVFibKJFjXTcImGPkQCdd5TGXgTijYowuGcs0YYOAxnuDJ77aJ9j2oVylbBmFDkkcFODrouxUuzuTRqg= |
| In-reply-to: | <9c43c6dd0706181159g412a60bekeaabcae80143172a@mail.gmail.com> |
| List-help: | <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com> |
| List-id: | <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com> |
| Mailing-list: | contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <9c43c6dd0706181159g412a60bekeaabcae80143172a@mail.gmail.com> |
| Resent-date: | Sun, 24 Jun 2007 00:41:20 -0600 (MDT) |
| Resent-from: | pen-test-return-1078484454@securityfocus.com |
| Resent-message-id: | <20070624064120.23331143ABB@outgoing2.securityfocus.com> |
| Resent-sender: | listbounce@securityfocus.com |
| Sender: | listbounce@securityfocus.com |
Thanks for all of the great responses. I guess it may help to clear up a few things. 53 is valid and documented. 3389 is not documented, but I already know the answer before I ask why they did this ;-) But 1029 and 1032, were the interesting ones ot me. Not documented or common to myself. On 6/18/07, killy <killfactory@gmail.com> wrote: Scanning my external firewall(at work), I (yes, it is my job to) find this: PORT STATE SERVICE 53/tcp open domain 1029/tcp open ms-lsa 1032/tcp open iad3 3389/tcp open ms-term-serv Why would 1029 and 1032 need to be open from the outside? -Kill -- If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked. What's more, you deserve to be hacked. -- former White House cybersecurity czar Richard Clarke -- If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked. What's more, you deserve to be hacked. -- former White House cybersecurity czar Richard Clarke ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat? Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic See HOW Now with our 20/20 program! http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: pen testing flash games., Nathan Bijnens |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: listening to people/offices when on-hold on the phone, Robin Wood |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Strange ports, Tim Shea |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Strange ports, ebk_lists |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |