pen-test
[Top] [All Lists]

analysis after hack - marks and tracks you can see..

To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: analysis after hack - marks and tracks you can see..
From: D.K. <dunkeeper@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 01:11:59 +0200
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: pentest-list2@consult.net
Delivered-to: mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com
Delivered-to: moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=cXdM0sOBDznfdLdrO9AZve72wixDgFaAw+Ywk2dXyn37Pg24kGNsJBqnFD4H/0hDkuvYJc8+GL+EA/kkGi68hpByJRRe/0CeUlr/YOID1nASYtTstcptPOmJ8W7x7EuY3UpM0mtDhzjwb30CbT5KyPWHxaNhbBGGFPFsceLL5g0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=EIbEpaWoecEn63zO66FLyCffnSazWC+UYWvO03sOyXut3G1VG5sWwGFYHY4wWpoaxuMafZTdtjsgyalRkf8dVXQr+KePBgpfCRA4dvQt6KStbra3DMCyM0vyz9yHBwOSukQfKvNPTyHA+SOAyl93Cif9jFoZ2XsRh+99iTblZxI=
List-help: <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
Resent-date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:22:17 -0600 (MDT)
Resent-from: pen-test-return-1078484456@securityfocus.com
Resent-message-id: <20070626002217.DC1BD143FDC@outgoing2.securityfocus.com>
Resent-sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
Sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
Hi all,
I want to open a discussion about [old||new||newest] methods in
detection of "attendance an intruder in linux system".
In general I'm interested in subject of analysis after hack,
especially - what kind of a marks/track intruder leaves after himself.
Where an administrator should look and for what he should looking for.
What are typical and non typical signals which can say anybody who
shouldn't is/was in the system.
If anybody can describe for me methods and give real examples of use a
method of discovering a intruder and a examples of a activity of an
intruder and examples of marks and tracks which was or can be leave in
a system I would be grateful
Thank you for all responses

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!

http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • analysis after hack - marks and tracks you can see.., D . K . <=