pen-test
[Top] [All Lists]

Port Scanning Issues

To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: Port Scanning Issues
From: crumdub12@gmail.com
Date: 25 Jun 2007 21:59:58 -0000
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: pentest-list2@consult.net
Delivered-to: mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com
Delivered-to: moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com
List-help: <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
Resent-date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:26:14 -0600 (MDT)
Resent-from: pen-test-return-1078484462@securityfocus.com
Resent-message-id: <20070626002614.2C91314423D@outgoing2.securityfocus.com>
Resent-sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
Sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
A Chairde,

   Havin, some issues with scanning stacks on my system.

1. Using Superscan4 ,  I scan stack UDP-TCP 1-65534 , Sometimes I 
get no ports open , another time I get 49159 UDP Ports open, only get port 
report, no attempt made to open any ports ... , when get open ports , I always 
get 49159 UDP Ports ...... , use the scanner at 250msecs , takes around 16 
hours to finish.

2. Using Languard, Nessus and Retina , get different scans from each tool, any 
ideas why, how do I find out real ports open.. differences can be 10,000 ports


------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!

http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>