| To: | crumdub12@gmail.com, listbounce@securityfocus.com, pen-test@securityfocus.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Port Scanning Issues |
| From: | sherwyn.williams@gmail.com |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Jun 2007 11:53:11 +0000 |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | pentest-list2@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com |
| Delivered-to: | moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-rim-org-msg-ref-id:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:references:in-reply-to:sensitivity:importance:to:subject:from:date:content-type:mime-version; b=i8m/FM/TmbP2YQhRC176nkOlg1y6g4Vwofkm8gO3973pqNXJgwidhaX3kwLlVYKoH7hu8iEWIpMkE1VM9v3S0zfoCTo5mrwzzkfkCnXzLraYRyQ6+Ls9yCn1yq6BUsiPeTZjVc8+gGtuy9Lx9SzvInEWa+2VrHK247qXGAgHw3o= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:x-rim-org-msg-ref-id:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:references:in-reply-to:sensitivity:importance:to:subject:from:date:content-type:mime-version; b=FnqtjDsc9Agxd8U4hXSDHR5eV+IaBN2OtKhLnkY8dr3x6kGCsFQfrf5a/dSdxFpmsfwZDjG+IuUHFqK/k523fUelWZ21NPSILP51lck3f5/FPaSemxLEOIY5+P2ZgD2sO5I9EvoXuZk76u1+nV3Q+0YcCAjADnjetTE84jgWuec= |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <20070625215958.25364.qmail@securityfocus.com> |
| List-help: | <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com> |
| List-id: | <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com> |
| Mailing-list: | contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <20070625215958.25364.qmail@securityfocus.com> |
| Resent-date: | Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:58:49 -0600 (MDT) |
| Resent-from: | pen-test-return-1078484471@securityfocus.com |
| Resent-message-id: | <20070626235849.4959A144577@outgoing2.securityfocus.com> |
| Resent-sender: | listbounce@securityfocus.com |
| Sender: | listbounce@securityfocus.com |
| Sensitivity: | Normal |
For staters haveyou used Nmap also the host that is being scanned do you have a
firewall on it, and if so is it setup to drop any icmp packets?
If you use nmap with a no ping scann and then look for tcp fiirst then udp you
should get some results.
Nmap -P0 -sT
-sU for udp.
Sherwyn Williams
Technical Support
The Williams Solutions
-----Original Message-----
From: crumdub12@gmail.com
Date: 25 Jun 2007 21:59:58
To:pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: Port Scanning Issues
A Chairde,
Havin, some issues with scanning stacks on my system.
1. Using Superscan4 , I scan stack UDP-TCP 1-65534 , Sometimes I
get no ports open , another time I get 49159 UDP Ports open, only get port
report, no attempt made to open any ports ... , when get open ports , I always
get 49159 UDP Ports ...... , use the scanner at 250msecs , takes around 16
hours to finish.
2. Using Languard, Nessus and Retina , get different scans from each tool, any
ideas why, how do I find out real ports open.. differences can be 10,000 ports
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!
http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Port Scanning Issues, ebk_lists |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Mpack, Nikolaj |
| Previous by Thread: | Port Scanning Issues, Steinar Watne |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Port Scanning Issues, Jamie Riden |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |