pen-test
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: Mpack

To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Re: Mpack
From: jason_jones98@hotmail.com
Date: 28 Jun 2007 15:04:08 -0000
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: pentest-list2@consult.net
Delivered-to: mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com
Delivered-to: moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com
List-help: <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mailing-list: contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
Resent-date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:55:29 -0600 (MDT)
Resent-from: pen-test-return-1078484501@securityfocus.com
Resent-message-id: <20070628205529.3B768237717@outgoing3.securityfocus.com>
Resent-sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
Sender: listbounce@securityfocus.com
You should not apologise, you have done nothing wrong. If a pen-tester is only 
interested in gathering "potential" vulnerabilities with automated tools, then 
they should consider themselves "not" a pen-tester. Malicious code and the use 
of malicious code is a "must" for a pen-tester. some advice with using 
customizable exploit tools: "know what the outcome is" - if you are not 100% 
then do not use.

JJ

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Swap Out your SPI or Watchfire app sec solution for
Cenzic's robust, accurate risk assessment and management
solution FREE - limited Time Offer

http://www.cenzic.com/wf-spi
------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>