| To: | pen-test list <pen-test@securityfocus.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Skype use obligation - Security x Productivity |
| From: | Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@cisco.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:34:57 -0700 |
| Authentication-results: | sj-dkim-3; header.From=rdobbins@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; ); |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | pentest-list2@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com |
| Delivered-to: | moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com |
| Dkim-signature: | v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=597; t=1184740500; x=1185604500; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=rdobbins@cisco.com; z=From:=20Roland=20Dobbins=20<rdobbins@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Skype=20use=20obligation=20-=20Security=20x=20Product ivity |Sender:=20; bh=Pv5u+Vae0vuz7rfcphmvV6VWiCp3n9YKBQ8CKhPRnMc=; b=sED7H52PJ/WysU5u3qq7I0wsLkY36+HFY3r7YYbIyqBqXmYyxBsZSFbsZ1t9fL3ginHS+nUF j3pX90xOpxguM5uff2pnrWVtO3hpKMw8n96MDyVvIFsNjwNKIcP8W2jz; |
| In-reply-to: | <1184739160.4197.13.camel@localhost> |
| List-help: | <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com> |
| List-id: | <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com> |
| Mailing-list: | contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <2df3b0cb0707161456j4363b7e4hd06f20854b1fddbc@mail.gmail.com> <D8C57D06-02D4-41D6-AD35-FB6BFB0C84C2@cisco.com> <1184739160.4197.13.camel@localhost> |
| Resent-date: | Wed, 18 Jul 2007 00:29:54 -0600 (MDT) |
| Resent-from: | pen-test-return-1078484620@securityfocus.com |
| Resent-message-id: | <20070718062954.BDBD02372CC@outgoing3.securityfocus.com> |
| Resent-sender: | listbounce@securityfocus.com |
| Sender: | listbounce@securityfocus.com |
On Jul 17, 2007, at 11:12 PM, Cedric Blancher wrote: If a node is NATed, it won't get elected. Plain and simple. Yes, but this doesn't help for nodes which aren't NATted, for example. I believe the supernode behavior is hardcoded, with no way to disallow a given host from participating - unless you're aware of a way to disable that functionality?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@cisco.com> // 408.527.6376 voice
Culture eats strategy for breakfast.
-- Ford Motor Company
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Swap Out your SPI or Watchfire app sec solution for
Cenzic's robust, accurate risk assessment and management
solution FREE - limited Time Offer
http://www.cenzic.com/c/wf-spi
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| Previous by Date: | RE: Mile2 Training (Certifications), Ken Kousky |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Skype use obligation - Security x Productivity, Pretorius, Wynand (ZA - Johannesburg) |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Skype use obligation - Security x Productivity, Cedric Blancher |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Skype use obligation - Security x Productivity, Justin Ferguson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |