| To: | pen-test@securityfocus.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: NMAP Concurrent Scans |
| From: | "Burak CIFTER" <hybridus.ml@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:53:11 +0300 |
| Cc: | Clone <en0lc@yahoo.com> |
| Delivered-to: | sp-com-lists@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | pentest-list2@consult.net |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com |
| Delivered-to: | moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=q+z/fOuRMegLn/154T5nH/RU7ocKr3GA703aubFLIayHC6weubpCatAy5wDRK6HEtFmEDhBFZzL68mr0YY+c4TLTTAzlKkOh2Hx288+ft49oLer5hsHkXoDw4kdOnlTZqe97rktVQxRsH/mKNzQJ3WliDlmb+4EPWF8hEX18h7g= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=T3CIPL7EnxT5rJ5DJXgs1hoI8miQDrxp3TyexGdg/jWYRRci9Kp7W/dZkbyGSOTB7xCQs6MMOr0m5MxvGDoLKDK3MOzqn1C9Sr80xC5TQT6SrEZcoh+qgZCUVlDc0XA5cxL07Sqy1CWDhUvX9Kylj3J+dJplRp5n8L4EH69TNCw= |
| In-reply-to: | <211117.55584.qm@web44816.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> |
| List-help: | <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com> |
| List-id: | <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com> |
| Mailing-list: | contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm |
| References: | <211117.55584.qm@web44816.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> |
| Resent-date: | Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:46:40 -0600 (MDT) |
| Resent-from: | pen-test-return-1078484806@securityfocus.com |
| Resent-message-id: | <20070811074640.30E68F81FB@outgoing2.securityfocus.com> |
| Resent-sender: | listbounce@securityfocus.com |
| Sender: | listbounce@securityfocus.com |
It may return false result due to ids/firewall rules. If there's no firewall, you won't need to do xmas scan. So I understand that the host is protected somehow. In this case (scanning with all techniques in the same time), the result wouldn't be reliable. You should perform the scan using techniques in an order from paranoid level of sensivity to connect scan. Burak Çifter On 8/10/07, Clone <en0lc@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I'm new to NMAP. I have a curious question that I > wanted to get expert opinion on... > > I was wondering whether running SYN, FIN, XMAS, NULL > and ACK scans in parallel on a target generate false > results. Since same client IP is asking for opening & > closing a connection on target machine will it not > render some ports open and other closed in the > report? > > RGDS > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! > FareChase. > http://farechase.yahoo.com/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This list is sponsored by: Cenzic > > Need to secure your web apps NOW? > Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast. > Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today! > > http://www.cenzic.com/downloads > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps NOW? Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast. Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today! http://www.cenzic.com/downloads ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: External Pentests Obsolete?, US Infosec |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: External Pentests Obsolete?, Van Heerden, Francois (CSS) |
| Previous by Thread: | NMAP Concurrent Scans, Clone |
| Next by Thread: | Re: NMAP Concurrent Scans, Tim |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |