Scott Kitterman skrev, on 04-08-2007 23:55:
On Saturday 04 August 2007 17:38, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
Scott Kitterman skrev, on 04-08-2007 20:17:
[...]
I've been testing this myself and am not entirely convinced, but see
definite progress over DK. There are interoperability issues that need
to be explored. One example that I've yet to have time to root cause is
apparent message verification failures on messages sent from one MUA when
they pass sent from another MUA via the same MTA to the same destination.
I can't parse this. What does the MUA have to do with it? All the
signing is done by the outgoing MTA. There have been discussions and
solutions proffered for MTAs signing for other MTAs, but that's not what
you are getting at.
As I said, I haven't had time to really understand this yet. All I know at
this point is that mail sent from my Kmail generally validates and mail sent
via my Treo through the same MTA to the same MX does not. I suspect it's
there's a data conversion somewhere in the path and the two MUAs format
differently.
It's somewhere near the top of my TODO, I just haven't gotten to it yet.
Well, your signatures are verifying fine:
barlaeus.nl:1/0 4 pass/0 fail, last l=1, a=0, Sat Aug 4 08:43:39 2007
megan.vbhcs.org:1/1 0 pass/1 fail, last l=1, a=0, Fri Aug 3
22:26:53 2007
kitterman.com:0/0 2 pass/0 fail, last l=1, a=0, Sat Aug 4
23:59:33 2007
salmi.ch:1/0 3 pass/0 fail, last l=1, a=0, Sun Aug 5 00:04:52 2007
charite.de:0/0 1 pass/0 fail, last l=1, a=0, Fri Aug 3 23:24:03 2007
Best,
--Tonni
--
Tony Earnshaw
Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl
|
