On Aug 11, 2007, at 11:13 AM, Gary V wrote:
As an alternate to lowering $sa_dsn_cutoff_level, consider changing it to
D_DISCARD -
My suggestion on this score would be to set it to D_PASS.
The user exists, after all.
Throw it in the user's Trash (and warn them!), but don't discard, and
NEVER, EVER bounce.
Aloha mai Nai`a!
--
Yes, with D_DISCARD there is a potential for loss of mail. I think which one
to use depends on the quarantine situation (among a number of other
considerations). If a quarantine is configured, then the mail is still there
- waiting for review. This is really no different than using D_PASS and
throwing it in the trash as you suggest. In your case the trash bin is
simply a quarantine area. If there is no quarantine then it would be better
to D_PASS and let the users filter or direct messages as they (or the admin)
see fit - unless they collectively agree that the potential loss of an
occasional legitimate message is acceptable. For my small group of users I
currently quarantine over 8.0 and discard over 14.0 (via use of
$sa_quarantine_cutoff_level). At any rate, D_DISCARD or D_PASS will prevent
bounces while D_BOUNCE or D_REJECT will create them.
Gary V
_________________________________________________________________
Messenger Café ? open for fun 24/7. Hot games, cool activities served daily.
Visit now. http://cafemessenger.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_AugHMtagline
|
