vulnwatch
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Your Opinion

To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com, vulnwatch@vulnwatch.org, full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Subject: Re: Your Opinion
From: The Fungi <fungi@yuggoth.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:22:45 +0000
Delivered-to: sp-com-lists@consult.net
Delivered-to: bugtraq-list@securepoint.com
Delivered-to: mailing list bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Delivered-to: moderator for bugtraq@securityfocus.com
In-reply-to: <000e01c767fb$b1ca35e0$097393d1@MyBabies>
List-help: <mailto:bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com>
List-id: <bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com>
List-post: <mailto:bugtraq@securityfocus.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
Mail-followup-to: bugtraq@securityfocus.com, vulnwatch@vulnwatch.org, full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Mailing-list: contact bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
References: <000e01c767fb$b1ca35e0$097393d1@MyBabies>
Reply-to: bugtraq@securityfocus.com, vulnwatch@vulnwatch.org, full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 06:48:30PM -0000, Mark Litchfield wrote:
> I have heard the comment "It's a huge conflict of interest" for one company 
> to provide both an operating platform and a security platform" made by John 
> Thompson (CEO Symantec) many times from many different people.
[...]

My take on this statement: it's a polite way of pointing out the
scam-artist-like behavior for someone selling known-insecure
software and then charging you extra to secure it. "Oh, you wanted
the version *without* built-in vulnerabilities?"
-- 
{ IRL(Jeremy_Stanley); PGP(9E8DFF2E4F5995F8FEADDC5829ABF7441FB84657);
SMTP(fungi@yuggoth.org); IRC(fungi@irc.yuggoth.org#ccl); ICQ(114362511);
AIM(dreadazathoth); YAHOO(crawlingchaoslabs); FINGER(fungi@yuggoth.org);
MUD(fungi@katarsis.mudpy.org:6669); WWW(http://fungi.yuggoth.org/); }

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>